Table 2.
Citation, Country | Purpose of study | Description of study | Type and method of | Outcome measure | Key findings | comments | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
screening | management | ||||||
Screening for COPD without subsequent management component | |||||||
1. Castillo et al.49 2008. Spain | To evaluate the feasibility of a community pharmacy program for COPD case finding in high risk customers by means of spirometry | Design: Pilot cross-sectional descriptive study N: 161 Duration: 1 month |
Questionnaire: Validated GOLD screening questionnaire Lung function test: spirometry |
Referral to the hospital for further assessment | Primary: identification of patients at high risk of
COPD. Secondary: assess feasibility of providing spirometry by community pharmacies |
62% were identified at high risk by the GOLD questionnaire and
24% had an FEV1/FVC ratio<0.7 indicative of airflow
limitation. 70% of spirometries were rated as being of acceptable quality |
Multi-site setting. Convenience sampling Pharmacists training provided |
Screening for COPD with subsequent management | |||||||
2. Fuller et al.50 2012. USA | To determine if pharmacists can accurately perform spirometry screening and interpret results | Design: prospective study N: 185 Duration: 4 months |
Questionnaire: Validated COPD screener questionnaire Lung function test: spirometry |
Referral of people with obstruction to their physician for
review and follow-up. Lung age calculation for active smokers
based on their spirometry result and counseling provided on
smoking cessation. Patients were followed-up after 2-6 months by phone or email |
Primary: identification of patients at high risk of
COPD. Secondary: assess feasibility of providing spirometry by community pharmacies Spirometry screening improved enrolment in smoking cessation programs |
9% of people screened had airflow obstruction FEV1/FVC<LLN
(lower limit of Normal) indicative of obstructive lung
disease. 99% of the spirometry tests were judged acceptable by pulmonary experts. 78% reported some attempt at smoking cessation and 22% had successfully quit smoking after screening. 33% of the participants with obstruction had seen their physician for treatment |
Multi-site setting (4 pharmacies). Convenience sampling Pharmacists training provided |