Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 20;8(12):e81966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081966

Table 2. FGD respondent demographic information shown by village and gender.

Males (n = 28) Village A Village B Village C Village D Village E
Age 35–60 21–75 22–60 18–37 19–50
FGD size 6 6 6 4 6
Number in household (persons) 6–12 2–13 4–8 5–7 3–8
Number in household <5 yrs old 0–2 0–5 0–1 0–1 0–2
Number in household pregnant 0 0–1 0 0 0
Highest formal education None (5)8th std (1) None (3)2nd std (1)5th std (1)10th std (1) None (2)9th std (2)12th std (1)Masters (1) 8th std (1)9th std (1)10th std (2) None (2)2nd std (1)4th std (1)8th std (2)
Households with electricity 2/6 1/6 5/6 1/4 3/6
Households with scooter 2/6 0/6 0/6 0/4 1/6
Annual income (in Rupees) 12,000–60,000 ? – 9,000 10,000–25,000 20,000–60,000 ? – 10,000

Age is self-reported, in years. Number of participants in focus group, household size, number of household members under the age of 5 years, and number of pregnant members of household are shown. Education levels are shown as “standard”, which is equivalent to a primary or secondary school “grade” in the United States. The number of FGD participants reporting that highest level of education is shown in parenthesis. Number of households who report having electricity or owning a scooter is shown as fraction of total FGD participants from that village. Annual income is self-reported and often respondents were unsure of this figure (where ‘?’ is indicated).