Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 20;8(12):e82402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082402

Table 2. SNP frequencies in wCer of R. cerasi and de novo hosts.

A
no gatB of wCer bases SNP- SNP- assay P valuec P valued
frequencya frequencyb
1 wCer1 of R. cerasi 9696 0.52 nd nd
2 wCer2 of R. cerasi 8888 1.01 0.73 1 vs. 2 0.3346 0.8854
3 wCer1 of RC 1212 2.48 nd 1 vs. 3 0.0703* nd
4 wCer2 of RC 29088 1.01 0.73 2 vs. 4 0.6057 0.6152
5 RC20 4848 2.68 2.40 4 vs. 5 0.0188* 0.0109*
6 RC33 4848 0.83 0.55 4 vs. 6 0.2103 0.6386
7 RC45 4848 1.24 0.96 4 vs. 7 0.9097 0.8714
8 RC50 4848 1.03 0.75 4 vs. 8 0.9718 0.9391
9 RC21 4848 0.00 −0.28 4 vs. 9 0.0622* nd
10 WolMed88.6 4848 1.65 1.37 4 vs. 10 0.4453 0.3824

Frequencies were calculated for (A) coxA, (B) ftsZ, and (C) gatB. Column ‘bases’ gives the total number of sequenced bases.

a SNP-frequency per kilobase;

b SNP-frequency per kilobase minus calculated error base line (0.28/kb) of Taq polymerase;

c two-tailed P values from χ2 calculations with Yates Correction (2×2 contingency table) for a;

d two-tailed P values from χ2 calculations with Yates Correction (2×2 contingency table) for b.

Abbreviations: nd not determined.