Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 20;8(12):e83252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083252

Table 3. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models.

Univariate Multivariate
Hazard ratio 95%CI P-value Hazard ratio 95%CI P-value
PFS
Age 0.989 (0.97, 1.01) 0.31 0.987 (0.97, 1.01) 0.2
SexFemale 1 - - 1 - -
SexMale 1.07 (0.78, 1.48) 0.67 1.06 (0.77, 1.47) 0.71
ISS1 1 - - 1 - -
ISS2 1.45 (0.99, 2.14) 0.058 1.43 (0.97, 2.1) 0.069
ISS3 1.97 (1.31, 2.96) 0.0011 1.91 (1.27, 2.88) 0.0019
RI(0,75] 1 - - 1 - -
RI(75,100] 1.73 (1.2, 2.47) 0.003 1.65 (1.15, 2.37) 0.0063
OS
Age 0.991 (0.96, 1.02) 0.57 1.17 (0.7, 1.97) 0.55
SexFemale 1 - - 1 - -
SexMale 1.28 (0.77, 2.15) 0.34 2.36 (1.16, 4.79) 0.017
ISS1 1 - - 1 - -
ISS2 2.35 (1.16, 4.76) 0.018 4.01 (1.98, 8.11) 0.00011
ISS3 4.28 (2.13, 8.63) 4.7e-05 2.28 (1.33, 3.88) 0.0025
RI(0,75] 1 - - 1 - -
RI(75,100] 2.45 (1.44, 4.14) 0.00089 2.28 (1.33, 3.88) 0.0025

The sensitive and intermediate RI groups were merged into a common non-resistant group of patients. The redefined non-resistant (RI 0–75%) and resistant (RI 75–100%) groups were analysed by univariate (P-value  = 0.003 for PFS and P-value  = 0.00089 for OS) as well as a multivariate Cox proportional hazard models documenting an association with PFS and OS (P-value of 0.0063 and 0.0025), independent of age, sex and ISS staging. The appropriateness of the Cox proportional hazard models using the dichotomized resistance index was checked using cumulative martingale residuals.