Table 2. fMRI results between subjects.
| Region | L/R | x | y | z | Z | #vox | p |
| ImpSkew (neg. correl.) on interaction of posSkew>negSkew and risky>sure | |||||||
| Hippocampus | L | –27 | –16 | –20 | 4.6 | 456 | <1E-04 |
| Supr. Temporal gyr. | –57 | 2 | –8 | 3.7 | |||
| –57 | –7 | –14 | 3.6 | ||||
| OFC | L/R | 3 | 41 | –17 | 4.2 | 241 | 0.003 |
| 15 | 53 | –8 | 3.8 | ||||
| –3 | 59 | –2 | 3.4 | ||||
| Postcentral gyr. | L | –27 | –28 | 70 | 3.8 | 203 | 0.008 |
| –15 | –31 | 58 | 3.8 | ||||
| Precuneus | –9 | –40 | 58 | 3.5 | |||
| Precentral gyr. | R | 15 | –22 | 73 | 3.8 | 240 | 0.003 |
| 36 | –13 | 64 | 3.8 | ||||
| 48 | –7 | 55 | 3.8 | ||||
| PropRiskall (neg. correl.) on risky>sure | |||||||
| Antr. Insula/IFG | L | –30 | 26 | –11 | 4.3 | 150 | 0.028 |
| –36 | 17 | –5 | 4.3 | ||||
| –39 | 17 | 10 | 3.8 | ||||
| pre-SMA/dmPFC | L/R | 6 | 17 | 49 | 5.3 | 609 | <1E-06 |
| –6 | 26 | 46 | 4.9 | ||||
| –3 | 35 | 34 | 4.6 | ||||
| Infr. Parietal lobule | L | –39 | –52 | 37 | 5.1 | 909 | <1E-08 |
| –45 | –46 | 46 | 5.1 | ||||
| Postr. Parietal ctx. | –48 | –55 | 37 | 4.9 | |||
| Precuneus | R | 9 | –67 | 40 | 5.3 | 939 | <1E-08 |
| Postr. Parietal ctx. | 42 | –64 | 43 | 5.3 | |||
| Infr. Parietal lobule | 39 | –52 | 43 | 4.6 | |||
| Mid. Frontal gyr. | L | –39 | 17 | 37 | 4.3 | 337 | <1E-03 |
| IFG (p. Tri | –42 | 26 | 22 | 4.3 | |||
| IFG (p. Oper) | –51 | 20 | 34 | 3.9 | |||
| IFG (p. Oper) | R | 51 | 5 | 19 | 4.5 | 1095 | <1E-09 |
| 45 | 17 | 34 | 4.4 | ||||
| Mid. Frontal gyr. | 42 | 38 | 31 | 4.4 | |||
| Cerebellum | R | 36 | –70 | –44 | 4.4 | 279 | <1E-03 |
| 33 | –49 | –26 | 3.7 | ||||
| 27 | –40 | –26 | 3.5 | ||||
This table shows all activity surviving cluster level correction across the whole brain (P<0.05 FWE corrected; threshold of P<0.005 used to define the clusters) in the 2 valence by 2 skew type by 2 choice model, for contrasts involving: the second level covariate for risk overall (PropRiskall) on activity for accept>reject; the second level covariate for skew (ImpSkew) on the skew related activity seen across subjects (interaction of skew type and choice). For each cluster is shown: the three constituent peaks with the highest Z-scores; the number of voxels at P<0.005 (uncorrected); and the P-value of the cluster after FWE correction across the whole brain.