Table 3. Statistical results of comparisons between playback treatments for the time spent in vigilance while chewing and exclusive vigilance in the pre- and post-playback periods.
Periods | Contrast pairs |
Vigilance while chewing
|
Exclusive vigilance
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coeff ± SE | t | P | Coeff ± SE | z | P | ||
Pre-playback | Lion vs. Control | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
Impala vs. Control | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
Lion vs. Impala | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
Post-playback | Lion vs. Control | ns | ns | ns | -0.689 ± 0.099 | -6.973 | >0.001 |
Impala vs. Control | 0.227 ± 0.096 | 2.887 | 0.006 | ns | ns | ns | |
Lion vs. Impala | 0.279 ± 0.105 | 2.654 | 0.011 | 0.841 ± 0.110 | 7.676 | >0.001 |
The statistical comparisons included the Holm correction (for multiple comparisons).