Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 5;2013:683964. doi: 10.1155/2013/683964

Table 2.

Efficacy endpoints in randomized trials of everolimus with reduced-exposure cyclosporine versus MMF with standard-exposure cyclosporine.

Parameter A2310 [9] A2411 [5]
12 months 24 months 12 months
MMF Everolimus 1.5 mg MMF Everolimus 1.5 mg MMF Everolimus 1.5 mg
Number of patients 271 282 271 282 84 92
Composite efficacy failurea, % 33.6 35.1b 41.3 39.4c 41.7 32.6
AR associated with HDC, % 2.6 3.9 5.2 4.3 1.2 2.2
BPAR, ISHLT grade ≥ 3A, % 24.7 22.3 27.3 24.1 29.8 22.8d
BPAR treated with antibody, % No data No data No data No data 2.4 5.4
Graft loss/re-transplant, % 1.8 1.4 3.7 2.5 Composite: 11.9 Composite: 10.9
Death, % 4.8 7.8e 9.2 10.6e
Loss to followup, % 3.7 3.2 5.2 3.5 No data No data

AR: acute rejection; BPAR: biopsy proven acute rejection; HDC: hemodynamic compromise; ISHLT: International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation; MMF: mycophenolate mofetil.

aDefined as BPAR grade ≥ 3A (or any BPAR in A2310), acute rejection associated with hemodynamic compromise, graft loss/retransplant, death, or loss to followup.

b P = 0.002 for noninferiority (noninferiority margin 13%); P = 0.705 for no-difference test.

cNoninferior to the MMF group (noninferiority margin 13%).

d P = 0.005 for noninferiority.

eIncluding one death in a patient who never received everolimus.