Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 22.
Published in final edited form as: Hippocampus. 2012 Oct;22(10):10.1002/hipo.22046. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22046

Table 1.

Spatial information, rate map stability, and object-responsive neurons in superficial and deep layers of PRC and LECa

Median spatial
information score
(bits/spike) in
session 1
(IQRBb)
Proportion of
neurons with
significant spatial
information score
in session 1
Median Pearson
correlation
coefficient
between sessions
1 and 2
(IQRB)
Proportion of
object-responsive
neurons
PRC sup 0.26 (0.20–0.52) 8/25 0.14 (0.03–0.23) 23/42
PRC deep 0.33 (0.18–0.52) 3/10 0.2 (0.04–0.37) 5/12
LEC sup 0.35 (0.20–0.62) 62/76 0.53 (0.34–0.69) 48/89
LEC deep 0.32 (0.21–0.61) 32/42 0.51 (0.37–0.64) 20/50
a

Subdividing neurons into superficial and deep layers led to exclusion of some neurons as they could not be definitively assigned to either the deep or superficial layer, leading to only a subpopulation of neurons from PRC and LEC being included in these analyses.

b

Interquartile range bounds

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure