Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 22.
Published in final edited form as: Hippocampus. 2012 Oct;22(10):10.1002/hipo.22046. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22046

Table 2.

p values for statistical comparisons between superficial and deep layers of PRC and LEC

Spatial
information
score in session
1
(Wilcoxon rank
sum test)
Proportion of
neurons with
significant spatial
information
score in session 1
2 test)
Pearson correlation
coefficient
between sessions
(Wilcoxon rank
sum test)
Proportion of
object-
responsive
neurons
2 test)
PRC sup vs. PRC deep 0.9 0.77 0.52 0.64
PRC sup vs. LEC sup 0.51 1 × 10−5*** 6 × 10−4*** 0.92
PRC sup vs. LEC deep 0.47 0.0009*** 4 × 10−7*** 0.23
PRC deep vs. LEC sup 0.53 0.002** 0.003** 0.62
PRC deep vs. LEC deep 0.68 0.02* 0.005** 0.82
LEC sup vs. LEC deep 0.92 0.65 0.76 0.16
*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01,

***

p < 0.001. Holm-Bonferroni correction (Holm, 1979) was used to account for multiple comparisons, at family wide error rate = 0.05.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure