Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 23.
Published in final edited form as: Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Aug 7;115(2):10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.06.038. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.06.038

Table 1.

Patient characteristics

Variable Number of Patients (%) n=307
Age, years
    Median (range) 60 (25-88)
Histology
    Serous 245 (80%)
    Others 62 (20%)
Tumor grade
    High 264 (86%)
    Other 43 (14%)
Preoperative CA-125, U/ml; Median (range)
    All patients (n=307) 840 (40-38100)
    Optimally debulked (n=209) 613 (40-29100)
    Suboptimally debulked (n=98) 1258 (69-38100)
Ascites volume, ml
    Median (range) 900 (0-12000)
Residual tumor size
    Microscopic optimal 59 (19%)
    Macroscopic optimal 150 (49%)
    Suboptimal (>1.0 cm) 98 (32%)
Postoperative CA-125, U/ml; Median (range)
    All patients (n=307) 225 (9-29600)
    Optimally debulked (n=209) 161(9-8600)
    Suboptimally debulked (n=98) 443 (25-29600)
Postoperative chemotherapy
    IV platinum plus taxane 251 (82%)
    IV platinum plus other 31 (10%)
    IP platinum plus taxane 24 (8%)
Number of cycles
    Median (range) 6 (1-12)
Second-look surgery
    Yes 150 (49%)
    No 152 (50%)
    Missing 5 (2%)
Consolidation chemotherapy
    Yes 143 (47%)
    No 161 (52%)
    Missing 3 (1%)
Perioperative CA-125 response
    Steep (≥80%) 98 (32%)
    Moderate-High (50-79.99%) 110 (36%)
    Moderate-Low (0-49.99%) 64 (21%)
    Increase 35 (11%)

IV, intravenous; IP, intraperitoneal