Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec;33(6):367–373.

Table I.

Sialendoscopy & JRP: literature review of diagnostic outcomes.

Authors No. patients No. parotid involvement Mean age (years) Sex (M:F) Ultrasound findings (%) Sialographic findings (%) Sialendoscopic findings (%)
Mono Bi
Schneider H19 15 9 6 7.5 10:5 Heterogeneous glands (100%)
Sialectasia (100%)
NA NA
Capaccio P20 14 8 6 7.9 8:6 Heterogeneous glands (100%)
Sialectasia (100%)
NA White ductal wall without vessels (100%)
Fibrinous debris/mucous plugs (60%)
Stenosis (100%)
Kinks (30%)
Hackett AM21 12 5 7 9.7 7:5 NA NA White ductal wall without vessels (8%)
Fibrinous debris/mucous plugs (75%)
Stenosis (25%)
Konstantinidis I22 6 5 1 9.5 3:3 Sialectasia (100%) NA White ductal wall without vessels (100%)
Fibrinous debris/mucous plugs (100%)
Stenosis (50%)
Gary C23 3 3 0 9.0 3:0 NA NA White ductal wall without vessels (66%)
Fibrinous debris/mucous plugs (66%)
Stenosis (66%)
Normal (34%)
Martins-Carvalho C24 18 NA 9.0 12:6 Heterogeneous glands (46%)
Normal (27%)
Lithiasis (18%)
Sialectasia (9%)
NA White ductal wall without vessels (100%)
Stenosis (100%)
Jabbour N25 5 2 3 6.2 5:0 NA NA Fibrinous debris/mucous plugs (90%)
Stenosis (10%)
Shacham R26 70 47 23 6.7 43:27 Sialectasia (100%) Sialectasia (100%)
Kinks (NA%)
White ductal wall without vessels (100%)
Strictures & Kinks (NA%)
Quenin S27 10 3 7 5.0 4:6 Sialectasia (82%)
Lithiasis (18%)
NA White ductal wall without vessels (100%)
Stenosis (100%)
Fibrinous debris/mucous plugs (13%)
Nahlieli O28 26 20 6 7.0 14:12 Sialectasia (100%) Sialectasia (100%)
Kinks (31%)
White ductal wall without vessels (100%)

No. patients = number of patients with diagnosis of JRP submitted to diagnostic and interventional sialendoscopy

No. parotid involvement = number of monolateral (Mono) or bilateral (Bi) parotid involvement

NA = data not available