Table 2.

Significant effects of omnibus ANOVAs on ERP data.

	F	df	p	η2p
P1 PEAK AMPLITUDE
Hemisphere	7.96	1, 19	0.011	0.295
Ethnicity	25.69	1, 19	<0.001	0.575
Stimulus type	30.59	1, 19	<0.001	0.617
Orientation	15.70	1, 19	<0.001	0.452
Ethnicity × stimulus type	19.28	1, 19	<0.001	0.504
Hemisphere × ethnicity × stimulus type	4.79	1, 19	0.041	0.201
Stimulus type × orientation	23.96	1, 19	<0.001	0.558
P1 PEAK LATENCY
Ethnicity	4.94	1, 19	0.039	0.206
Stimulus type	21.63	1, 19	<0.001	0.532
Orientation	12.96	1, 19	0.002	0.406
N170 PEAK AMPLITUDE
Site	25.15	3, 57	<0.001	0.570
Task	9.30	1, 19	0.007	0.329
Ethnicity	8.05	1, 19	0.011	0.297
Stimulus type	122.56	1, 19	<0.001	0.866
Orientation	33.04	1, 19	<0.001	0.635
Site × task	4.11	3, 37	0.010	0.178
Task × stimulus type	10.01	1, 19	0.005	0.345
Site × ethnicity × stimulus type	3.13	3, 57	0.033	0.141
Site × orientation	13.42	3, 57	<0.001	0.414
Ethnicity × orientation	11.84	1, 19	0.003	0.384
Site × ethnicity × orientation	5.96	3, 57	0.001	0.239
Stimulus type × orientation	11.15	1, 19	0.003	0.370
Site × stimulus type × orientation	9.01	3, 57	<0.001	0.322
Site × ethnicity × stimulus type × orientation	3.12	3, 57	0.033	0.141
N170 PEAK LATENCY
Hemisphere	5.19	1, 19	0.034	0.215
Stimulus type	41.20	1, 19	<0.001	0.684
Orientation	17.67	1, 19	<0.001	0.482
Ethnicity × stimulus type	18.04	1, 19	<0.001	0.487
P2 MEAN AMPLITUDE
Site	100.36	3, 57	<0.001	0.841
Ethnicity	29.09	1, 19	<0.001	0.605
Stimulus type	43.68	1, 19	<0.001	0.697
Orientation	54.28	1, 19	<0.001	0.741
Task × ethnicity	4.76	1, 19	0.042	0.200
Site × task × ethnicity	5.82	3, 57	0.002	0.235
Task × stimulus type	5.82	1, 19	0.026	0.234
Ethnicity × stimulus type	60.86	1, 19	<0.001	0.762
Hemisphere × task × ethnicity × stimulus type	4.93	1, 19	0.039	0.206
Stimulus type × orientation	5.64	1, 19	0.028	0.229
Task × stimulus type × orientation	5.35	1, 19	0.032	0.220