Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 12;5:ecurrents.md.f63ae7dde63caa718fa0770217c5a0e6. [Version 1] doi: 10.1371/currents.md.f63ae7dde63caa718fa0770217c5a0e6

Table 3. Mean relative surface area (RSA) of the reachable workspace surface envelope from controls and Subjects with NMD by quadrant and total area.

Means ± SD and sample size (n) are presented as the average value over three repeated trials for dominant and non-dominant sides (there were no significant side to side difference). NMD vs Control by two-sample t-test. Ha: mean = 0

Quad 1 Quad 2 Quad 3 Quad 4 TOTAL
Subject samples (n) Contralateral Quadrants
Upper & Lower
Ipsilateral Quadrants
Upper & Lower
NMD 0.014
±0.019
(18)
0.012
±0.019
(18)
0.122
±0.107
(18)
0.151
±0.072
(18)
0.299
±0.198
(18)
CONTROL 0.070
±0.031
(40)
0.035
±0.016
(40)
0.248
±0.054
(40)
0.234
±0.031
(40)
0.586
±0.085
(40)
NMD vs CONTROL p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001