Table 1. Correlations between the sources and the average spectra.
STE Convex | STE Sammon Convex | STE MDS Convex | STE IMA Convex | LTE Convex | LTE Sammon Convex | LTE MDS Convex | LTE IMA Convex | ||
A2 vs. GL | A2 | 0.988 | 0.741 | 0.935 | 0.994 | 0.977 | 0.947 | 0.997 | 0.995 |
GL | 0.979 | 0.999 | 1.000 | 0.999 | 0.607 | 0.999 | 1.000 | 0.999 | |
A2 vs. ME | A2 | 0.988 | 0.931 | 0.915 | 0.981 | 0.990 | 0.981 | 0.995 | 0.986 |
ME | 0.994 | 0.999 | 0.998 | 1.000 | 0.872 | 0.994 | 0.999 | 0.993 | |
GL vs. ME | GL | 0.972 | 0.999 | 1.000 | 0.999 | 0.776 | 0.997 | 0.998 | 1.000 |
ME | 0.994 | 0.994 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.831 | 0.995 | 0.996 | 0.998 |
Table cells should be read as the correlations between the sources and the average spectra (see figures 3 and 4) of the different tumor types. The results of the best performing method for each classification problem are underlined. The latter is measured as the highest average value between the two correlations. When this highest average value is obtained by more than one method, all their corresponding results are underlined.