Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 14;64(18):5537–5551. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert321

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Phenotypic analysis of Arabidopsis fut4, fut6, and fut4/fut6 mutant plants compared to wild-type (WT) plants under physiological growth conditions. (A) Whole plant images of wild type, fut4, fut6, and fut4/fut6 mutant plants grown in soil at 32 DAG. (B) The rosette perimeters (at 29 DAG), plant height (at 43 DAG), branch numbers (at 43 DAG), and plant dry weight (at 49 DAG) compared among wild-type and fut4, fut6, and fut4/fut6 mutant plants. Data and error bars represent mean±SD (n=15). No significant differences were identified between wild type and any of the mutant lines for the parameters measured, as indicated by P>0.05 in Student’s t tests for continuous variables.