Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar;14(1):236–252. doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0198-y

Table 3.

Proportions of source correct, source incorrect (item only hits), source don’t know (item only hits), item miss, and item don’t know responses for the studied items are shown as a function of study task (self, other), presentation (one, two), and age (young, older). Proportions of false alarm and correct rejection to the unstudied items are also shown.

Proportion means (and standard deviation)
Young
Older
Response Type
Studied in the Self task 1
Presentation
2
Presentations
1
Presentation
2
Presentations
Source correct .48 (.15) .73 (.11) .36 (.16) .53 (.17)
Source incorrect .12 (.07) .10 (.07) .21 (.12) .22 (.12)
Source don’t know .24 (.12) .12 (.09) .26 (.21) .20 (.21)
Item miss .11 (.06) .03 (.04) .15 (.13) .04 (.06)
Item don’t know .05 (.07) .02 (.02) .02 (.03) .01 (.02)
Studied in the Other 1 2 1 2
task Presentation Presentations Presentation Presentations
Source correct .42 (.14) .67 (.14) .31 (.13) .46 (.16)
Source incorrect .15 (.09) .13 (.08) .25 (.14) .22 (.13)
Source don’t know .27 (.15) .14 (.08) .27 (.23) .25 (.21)
Item miss .11 (.06) .03 (.05) .14 (.11) .06 (.07)
Item don’t know .05 (.06) .03 (.05) .03 (.05) .01 (.03)
Unstudied
Correct Rejections .91 (.08) .83 (.20)
False Alarms .03 (.02) .12 (.15)
Don’t Know .06 (.08) .05 (.08)