Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 2.
Published in final edited form as: Psychophysiology. 2013 Aug 2;50(10):974–982. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12081

Table 2. Adolescent P3 Amplitude as a Function of PSU Onset.

Substanc
e Group
PSU
Onset
Electrode n Mean (SD)
P3 Amplitude,
uV
Main effect
for PSU
group vs
Controls
LSD post hoc
test for PSU
Group Onset
vs. Controls, p
value
Effect
Size for PSU
Onset vs.
Controls
PSU-
Nicotine
Early PZ 122 30.21 (9.63) F(2,1013) =
3.58, p =
0.03
0.01 0.19
FZ 123 5.96 (6.30)
Late PZ 181 30.49 (9.35) 0.10 0.16
FZ 181 6.26 (7.81)
PSU-
Alcohol
Early PZ 51 29.06(9.56) F(2,924) =
4.93, p =
0.01
0.02 0.30
FZ 52 5.24 (5.44)
Late PZ 161 30.37 (8.63) 0.02 0.21
FZ 164 5.69 (7.00)
PSU-
Illicit
Early PZ 40 29.16 (9.54) F(2,869) =
5.37, p <
0.01
0.02 0.32
FZ 41 4.91 (5.19)
Late PZ 111 30.19 (9.12) 0.01 0.23
FZ 114 5.48 (7.53)

Note: The characteristics of the control group for PZ were: n=743, mean = 32.01; SD = 9.09. The characteristics of the control group for FZ were: n = 746; mean = 7.31; SD = 7.36.