Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec;25(6):762–769. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2013.12.09

Table 1. MNA screening results [n (%)].

Categories Gender
Age (year)
Treatment duration (d)
HLA matching degree between donors and recipients
Male (n=71) Female (n=28) >18, ≤30 (n=54) >30 (n=45) <30 (n=53) ≥30 (n=46) Fully matched (n=38) Half matched (n=61)
Undernutrition 10* (14.1) 7 (25.0) 8 (14.8) 9 (20.0) 9 (17.0) 8 (17.4) 9 (23.7) 8 (13.1)
Potential undernutrition 58* (81.7) 16 (57.1) 43 (79.6) 31 (68.9) 38 (71.7) 36 (78.3) 25 (65.8) 49 (80.3)
Well-nourished 3* (4.2) 5 (17.9) 3 (5.6) 5 (11.1) 6 (11.3) 2 (4.3) 4 (10.5) 4 (6.6)
χ2 7.630** 1.701 1.626 2.642

MNA, mini nutritional assessment; *, significant differences in nutritional status between male group and female group; **, χ2 value for comparison of nutritional status between male and female groups, P<0.05.