Table 1. MNA screening results [n (%)].
Categories | Gender |
Age (year) |
Treatment duration (d) |
HLA matching degree between donors and recipients |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Male (n=71) | Female (n=28) | >18, ≤30 (n=54) | >30 (n=45) | <30 (n=53) | ≥30 (n=46) | Fully matched (n=38) | Half matched (n=61) | ||||
Undernutrition | 10* (14.1) | 7 (25.0) | 8 (14.8) | 9 (20.0) | 9 (17.0) | 8 (17.4) | 9 (23.7) | 8 (13.1) | |||
Potential undernutrition | 58* (81.7) | 16 (57.1) | 43 (79.6) | 31 (68.9) | 38 (71.7) | 36 (78.3) | 25 (65.8) | 49 (80.3) | |||
Well-nourished | 3* (4.2) | 5 (17.9) | 3 (5.6) | 5 (11.1) | 6 (11.3) | 2 (4.3) | 4 (10.5) | 4 (6.6) | |||
χ2 | 7.630** | 1.701 | 1.626 | 2.642 |
MNA, mini nutritional assessment; *, significant differences in nutritional status between male group and female group; **, χ2 value for comparison of nutritional status between male and female groups, P<0.05.