Table 5. MUST evaluation results (N=99).
| Nutritional risk status | Total case number (N=99) | Gender |
Age (year) |
Treatment duration in flow laminar ward (d) |
Consistency of stem cells between donors and recipients |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male (n=71) | Female (n=28) | >18, ≤30 (n=54) | >30 (n=45) | <30 (n=53) | ≥30 (n=46) | Fully matched (n=38) | Half matched (n=61) | ||
| Without or low nutritional risk [n (%)] | 36 (36.4) | 26 (36.6) | 10 (35.7) | 15* (27.8) | 21 (46.7) | 23 (43.4) | 13 (28.3) | 13 (34.2) | 23 (37.7) |
| Moderate nutritional risk [n (%)] | 5 (5.1) | 2 (2.8) | 3 (10.7) | 5 (9.3) | 0 (0) | 4 (7.5) | 1 (2.2) | 2 (5.3) | 3 (4.9) |
| Severe nutritional risk [n (%)] | 58 (58.5) | 43 (60.6) | 15 (53.6) | 34 (62.9) | 24 (53.3) | 26 (49.1) | 32 (69.5) | 23 (60.5) | 35 (57.4) |
| χ2 | - | 2.652 | 6.964** | 4.727 | 0.124 | ||||
MUST, malnutritional universal screening tools; *, significant differences in nutritional status between male group and female group; **, χ2 value for comparison of nutritional status between male and female groups, P<0.05.