Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 30;591(Pt 23):5809–5821. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.259150

Figure 3. Examples of PE T, CO2 and PE T, O2 control in a subject using an SGD breathing circuit and prospective end-tidal targeting.

Figure 3

The continuous traces from sampling at the mask are Inline graphic (blue upper) and Inline graphic (red lower). End-tidal values are Inline graphic (red filled squares) and Inline graphic (green filled circles), each representing a single breath. A, sinusoidal changes of Inline graphic and Inline graphic are implemented in phase until the blue arrow, when the phase of the Inline graphic is changed 180 deg. B, sinusoidal changes of Inline graphic and Inline graphic are implemented with the period of Inline graphic twice that of Inline graphic. C, simultaneous square wave changes in Inline graphic and Inline graphic are implemented independently of each other. In the sinusoidal patterns, the target Inline graphic and Inline graphic change with each breath. The algorithm used to reach these targets is context sensitive, that is, it takes into account the current gas concentrations in the lung as well as the target history. This means that the set of flows and inspired gas concentrations differ – even for the same recurrent end-tidal target values, whether they be in a sinusoidal sequence or steady target level. The algorithm uses the baseline Inline graphic, and resting CO2 production and O2 consumption to calculate inspired gas parameters. Baseline Inline graphic is based on the Inline graphic during rest. Resting CO2 production and O2 consumption are calculated from a nomogram based on sex, height and weight. Errors in presumption of CO2 production or O2 consumption, or changes in these due to changes in activity or muscle tone, result in target values drifting over time, as can be seen in A and C.