Table 2.
Dehydration experiment | GM plant | Treatment (min) | Expression | Expression profile* | SE | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T0 Generation | P1397 | 0 | 1.99 | - | ±2.3 | 0.559 |
30 | 89.2 | - | ±138.1 | 0.110 | ||
90 | 5.1 | - | ±9.8 | 0.241 | ||
P 2193 | 0 | 725 | - | ±1744.8 | 0.144 | |
30 | 535.2 | Up | ±1308.7 | 0.004 | ||
90 | 146.1 | Up | ±203.0 | 0.003 | ||
| ||||||
T1 Generation | P 1397 | 0 | 11.3 | Up | ±12.9 | 0.072 |
30 | 0.9 | - | ±1.1 | 0.965 | ||
90 | 0.001 | Down | ±0.002 | 0.022 | ||
P 2193 | 0 | 111.1 | Up | ±247.1 | 0.081 | |
30 | 0.28 | - | ±0.31 | 0.545 | ||
90 | 8.3 | - | ±10.5 | 0.141 |
The standard error (SE) was calculated for median values, with p < 0.1.
The values for up-regulated (UP) profiles were significantly different from the control group when the expression profile during water stress diverged from the control at 10% probability (p < 0.1) upon randomization testing (n = 2,000 iterations). All statistical analyses were done using RESTmsc software.