Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 26;8(12):e82648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082648

Table 2. The stimulating index of T lymphocyte proliferation in SPF chickens immunized with either pFDNA-PLGA-NPs, pVAX1-F (o), or Blank NP.

Groups Days post the immunization
14 28
pFDNA-PLGA-NPs i.n./i.m 1.996±0.262a 3.183±0.137Aa
pFDNA-PLGA-NPs i.n. 1.878±0.237a 3.077±0.177Aa
pFDNA-PLGA-NPs i.m 1.730±0.230a 2.856±0.145Bb
pVAX1-F (o) i.m 1.844±0.234a 2.335±0.199Cc
Blank PLGA-NPs i.n. 1.049±0.307b 1.032±0.137Dd
Blank PLGA-NPs i.m 0.985±0.244b 1.085±0.127Dd

Values are presented as mean ± S.D. of five experiments in each group. Values within the same column with the different lower case letter in the superscript are significantly different (p<0.05; Student's t-test), and with the different upper case letter in the superscript are extremely significant different (p<0.01; Student's t-test). The stimulation indices of chickens immunized with the pFDNA-PLGA-NPs by either i.m, i.n. or i.n./i.m. were extremely significantly higher than those of chickens immunized with the plasmid DNA pVAX1-F (o), or with blank PLGA-NPs (p<0.01), and the chickens immunized with the pFDNA-PLGA-NPs either i.n. or i.n./i.m. had significantly higher stimulation indices than the chickens immunized with the pFDNA-PLGA-NPs i.m at the fourth week post immunization (p<0.05).