TABLE 2.
Model I Alzheimer disease (N = 348) |
Model II Alzheimer disease (N = 308) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Odds Ratio (95% CI) | DF | Wald χ2 | p value | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | DF | Wald χ2 | p value | |
Age, years | 1.13 (1.08, 1.18) | 1 | 27.39 | <0.0001 | 1.14 (1.09,1.19) | 1 | 27.94 | <0.0001 |
White | 0.81 (0.65, 1.02) | 1 | 2.57 | 0.07 | 0.79 (0.63, 1.00) | 1 | 2.94 | 0.05 |
School, years | 0.89 (0.80, 1.00) | 1 | 3.99 | 0.05 | 0.88 (0.79, 0.99) | 1 | 4.36 | 0.04 |
ApoE4 | 1.42 (0.66, 3.05) | 1 | 0.49 | 0.36 | 0.25 (0.05, 1.21) | 1 | 3.26 | 0.09 |
ACE inhibitor use | 1.27 (0.64, 2.54) | 1 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.57 (0.24, 1.38) | 1 | 1.33 | 0.22 |
ApoE4*ACE inhibitors | - | - | - | - | 20.85 (3.08, 140.95) | 1 | 9.59 | 0.002 |
Notes: Using multivariate logistic analysis, we first examined the associations between AD and ApoE4 + ACE inhibitor independently (model I), then the interaction of ApoE4 and the ACE inhibitor use (model II) after adjusting for age, ethnicity, and school. ApoE4*ACE inhibitor: interaction between ApoE4 and ACE inhibitor use. Odds ratios with 95% confidence interval (95% CI), DF, and Wald χ2 test were shown for each variable in the models. p values for statistical significance are shown.