Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 26;8(12):e83673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083673

Table 3. Resume of the main outcomes concerning genomic sequence variants (SVs) detected.

Genomic sequence variants
g.226G>A g.229T>A g.355G>A g.1914G>C g.2037G>C g.2041A>C g.2065T>C
Minor allele percentage (%)
Normal 7.69
BeL 37.50 25.00 37.50 25.00
MaL 18.75 25.00 16.67 33.33 25.00
MeL 16.67 33.33 16.67 83.33 33.33
Heterozygosis percentage (%)
Normal 15.38
BeL 75.00 50.00 25.00 50.00
MaL 37.50 50.00 33.33 33.33 50.00
MeL 33.33 00.00 33.33 33.33 66.67
Allelic Association tests
Normal vs. CMLs No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Genotypic Association tests
Normal vs. CMLs No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Clinicopathological Correlation
CMLs No No Yes Yes No No No
SVs and AA changes analysis in Total Group of Samples
SVs Position Exon 11 Exon 11 Intron 12 Intron 14 Exon 15 Exon 15 Exon 15
Haplotypes with SVs 7 17 No 15; 16; 18 15; 18 11; 15; 17 15; 16; 17; 18; 19
Percentage of SV in Haplotypes (%) 8 0.5 <0.05 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.25
AA changes Arg46Lys Val47Glu NA NA Ala205Pro His206Pro Val214Ala
Probably effect in protein Benign Damage NA NA Benign Damage Damage

Sequence variants key marks reveal by experimental, statistic and in silico analysis. A detailed integrative analysis of nsSVs and their corresponding amino acid changes. The haplotypes corresponds to the frequent haplotypes detected in total samples (frequency >5%). SVs with probably damage effect in protein are in bold text. (%) Percentage. (NA) not applicable. (No) not observed.