Table 2.
DNA relatedness among Vibrio tritonius and the related vibiro species.
| Strain | G+C content (moles %) | % Reassociation with biotinylated DNA from: | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V. tritonius JCM 16456T | V. tritonius JCM 16457 | V. furnissii LMG 7910T | V. hepatarius LMG 20362T | |||
| V. tritonius | JCM 16456T | 44.2 | 100 | 92 | 5 | 5 |
| V. tritonius | JCM 16457 | 44.3 | 74 | 101 | NT | 23 |
| V. tritonius | JCM 16458 | 45.5 | 76 | 104 | 12 | 11 |
| V. tritonius | JCM 16459 | 45.2 | 70 | 100 | 13 | 14 |
| V. porteresiae | MSSRF 30T | 44.4 | 59* | NT | NT | NT |
| V. furnissii | LMG 7910T | 52.0 | 12 | 15 | 100 | 14 |
| V. fluvialis | LMG 7894T | 49.3–50.6 | 20 | NT | NT | NT |
| V. hepatarius | LMG 20362T | 46.0 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 100 |
| V. nereis | LMG 3895T | 48.0 | 6 | 13 | 4 | 20 |
| V. tubiashii | LMG 10936T | 46.1 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 24 |
*
The reciprocal DDH value of V. tritonius JCM 16456T against V. porteresiae MSSRF 30T probe was 46%.