Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 May 22;11(11):10.1016/j.cgh.2013.05.009. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.05.009

Table 5.

Subgroup Analysis and Dose-Response Relationship: Central Adiposity and Risk of BE

Subgroups Categories No. of studies Adjusted OR 95% CI P value between
groups (Pinteraction)
Study-related variables
  Study location Asian 1 1.45 0.82–2.55 .31
Western 14 2.01 1.49–2.72
  Study design Cross-sectional 1 1.65 0.82–3.33 .05a
C-C 12 2.22 1.61–3.06
Cohort 2 1.27 0.93–1.73
  Study setting Hospital-based 10 2.30 1.59–3.31 .10
Population-based 5 1.54 1.12–2.11
  Method of ascertainment Measured 14 2.08 1.58–2.74 .02a
Self-reported 1 1.20 0.83–1.74
Central adiposity–related variables
  Adjusted for BMI Yes 5 1.88 1.20–2.95 .79
No 10 2.03 1.45–2.84
  Reporting adiposityb Categorical 9 1.56 1.25–1.96 .06
Continuous 6 2.77 1.61–4.75
  Different measures of central adiposity Visceral adipose tissue area 4 1.78 1.19–2.67 .43
WHR/WTR 11 2.04 1.49–2.81
WC 11 1.58 1.25–1.99
Length of BE
Long-segment 5 1.96 1.39–2.75 .14
Short-segment 5 1.34 0.93–1.94
Dose-response relationship
  Central adiposity (reported as tertiles/quartiles) Q2 (vs Q1) 8 1.65 1.11–2.44 .53
Q3/Q4 (vs Q1) 8 1.92 1.47–2.50

C-C, case-control; Q, quartile; WTR, waist-thigh ratio.

a

Statistical significance.

b

Comparison of studies that reported data as categories with studies that reported means and standard deviations of adiposity in cases with BE and controls without BE (unadjusted) and transformed into a binary OR by using a statistical equation.