Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 15;36(1):83–103. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxt008

Table 2.

Summary of Results—Any Use of Hormone Therapy and Alzheimer's Disease/Dementia Risk

Author, Year (Reference No.) Study Study Design No. of Persons Covariates Exposure Distribution
Alzheimer's Disease
Dementia
Description % No. of Cases RRa 95% CI P Value No. of Cases RR 95% CI P Value
Brenner, 1994 (33) Alzheimer Disease Patient Registry-Group Health Cooperative Nested case-control 227 Age, history of hysterectomyb No hormone therapy 52 55 1.00 Referent
Hormone therapy 48 52 1.10 0.60, 1.80 0.73
Kawas, 1997 (34) Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging Prospective cohort 472 Age, educationc No hormone therapy 51 25 1.00 Referent
Hormone therapy 49 9 0.46 0.21, 1.00 0.05
Lindsay, 2002 (35) Canadian Study of Health and Aging Prospective cohort 2,079 Age, education No hormone therapy 94 106 1.00 Referent
Hormone therapy 6 4 1.37 0.48, 3.95 0.56
Roberts, 2006 (37) Rochester Epidemiology Project Nested case-control 486 Type of menopause, matched on age <6 months, never 89 216 1.00 Referent
≥6 months of hormone therapy 11 28 1.10 0.63, 1.93 0.73
Ryan, 2009 (39) Enquête de Santé Psychologique-Risques Incidence et Traitement Study Prospective cohort 996 Age, education No hormone therapy 66 19 1.00 Referent
Hormone therapy 34d 8 1.41 0.59, 3.34 0.44
Seshadri, 2001 (40) General Practice Research Database Nested case-control 283 Body mass index, smoking. Matched on age, physician's practice, case index date, date of first prescription in database <1 year, never 25 44 1.00 Referent
Hormone therapy 75 18 1.19 0.62, 2.27 0.60
Shao, 2012 (41) Cache County Study Prospective cohort 1,768 Age, APOE status, education, propensity score for any hormone therapy use No hormone therapy 38 89 1.00 Referent NR 1.00 Referent
Hormone therapy 62 87 0.80 0.58, 1.09 0.17 NR 0.84 0.65, 1.09 0.19
Shumaker, 2004 (11) Women's Health Initiative Memory Study Randomized placebo-controlled trial 7,479 None Placebo 51 21 1.00 Referent 40 1.00 Referent
E or E+P 49 33 1.62e 0.91, 2.96 0.08 68 1.76 1.19, 2.60 0.005
Tang, 1996 (42) Washington Heights–Inwood Columbia Aging Project Prospective cohort 1,124 Ethnicity, education, participation group (senior center vs. Medicare sample) No hormone therapy 86 158 1.00 Referent
Hormone therapy 14 9 0.50 0.25, 0.90 0.02
Waring, 1999 (43) Rochester Epidemiology Project Nested case-control 444 Controls matched by age and length of time in record linkage systemf <6 months, never 93 211 1.00 Referent
≥6 months 7 11 0.48 0.22, 1.01 0.05
Zandi, 2002 (45)g Cache County Study Prospective case-control 1,866 Age, education, APOEh No hormone therapy 43 58 1.00 Referent
Hormone therapy 57 26 0.59 0.36, 0.96 0.03

Abbreviations: APOE, apolipoprotein E; CI, confidence interval; E, estrogen; E+P, estrogen and progestin combined; NR, not reported; RR, relative risk.

a RR, or the relative risk, can be an odds ratio or a hazard ratio depending on the study design and sampling scheme; refer to Table 1 for the specific effect measure reported in each study.

b The investigators did not include the following variables in their final model because they determined that further adjustment for them did not appreciably change their findings: education, marital status, ethnicity, and history of either smoking or progestin use.

c The investigators examined other variables that did not affect the results of this study, including age at menopause, age at menarche, years of natural cyclic estrogen exposure, menopause duration, and surgical menopause.

d In contrast to many of the studies based in the United States, in this study women used predominantly transdermal estradiol (with or without progesterone), with less than 20% taking oral estradiol. None of the women took conjugated equine estrogens.

e Hazard ratios for Alzheimer's disease were not provided in the paper. We derived incidence rate ratios by using available data on Alzheimer's disease (number of cases, number of noncases, person-time).

f It is unclear which covariates (if any) were included in the final models, but authors reported that the odds ratio did not change noticeably after adjusting for education, age at menopause, and parity, and it was not different in the stratum of women who had undergone natural menopause or in the stratum of women who used estrogen for more than 1 year.

g This study was not included in our meta-analyses of any versus minimal or no hormone therapy use, as the Shao paper (41) from the same cohort provided updated results from the same study population.

h Authors reported that results did not change appreciably when terms were added separately for diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, depression, or use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.