Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Lett. 2012 Nov 20;340(2):10.1016/j.canlet.2012.11.029. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.11.029

Table 1.

Next-generation sequencing studies in gastric cancer

Study Method Samples Aberration type Main Findings
Wang et al. [30] Whole-exome sequencing 22 tumor and matched normal pairs Point mutations, small indels Frequent inactivating mutations in ARIDA1
Zang et al. [31] Whole-exome sequencing 15 tumor and matched normal pairs Point mutations, small indels Frequent inactivating mutations ARIDA1, FAT4
Zang et al. [32] Whole-kinome sequencing 14 GC cell lines 3 tumor and normal pairs Single nucleotide variations, gene fusions, and copy number variations Recurrent inactivating mutations in MAP2K4, gene fusions involving CDK12 and ERBB2
Holbrook et al. [33] Targeted DNA sequencing (384 genes) 44 tumor samples (36 with matched normal) Point mutations Genetic alternation in the WNT, Hedgehog, cell cycle, DNA damage and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition pathways
Kim et al. [40] Whole transcriptome RNA-sequencing 24 tumor samples and 6 normal samples mRNA expression, miRNA expression, recurrent somatic mutations AMPKα2 as a potential therapeutic target in Asian patients
Riberiro-dos-Santos [42] Small RNA Sequencing Healthy gastric tissue / 15 most highly expressed miRNAs in gastric tissue
Li et al. [43] Small RNA sequencing One pair of tumor and normal samples microRNA expression Biased selection of arm miRNAs from the same pre-miRNAs