Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 27;8(12):e84157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084157

Table 1. Thermodynamic analysis of the d3'EBS1*/IBS1* equilibrium by different methods.

Imaging condition Fraction of docked d3'EBS1* (%) K a (L µmol−1)
Gaussian fitting (method 1) no M(II)(NO3)2 8.2±3.0 3.6±1.3
1 mM Ni(NO3)2 18.5±6.1 9.1±3.7
1 mM Co(NO3)2 28.6±5.9 16.1±4.6
Dwell time analysis (HMM, method 2) no M(II)(NO3)2 15.6±6.4 7.4±3.6
1 mM Ni(NO3)2 24.6±6.3 13.1±4.5
1 mM Co(NO3)2 33.3±8.4 20.1±7.5
Histogram thresholding (method 3) no M(II)(NO3)2 7.8±2.6 3.4±1.2
1 mM Ni(NO3)2 16.3±5.4 7.8±3.1
1 mM Co(NO3)2 25.5±6.0 13.7±4.5

The experimental error was estimated by bootstrapping and accounts for 99.7% of the variability observed (3σ boba, “68–95–99.7 rule” [66]). Association constants K a were calculated from normalized cumulated FRET histograms or dwell times under the assumption that [IBS] = [IBS1*]tot as described in the Supplementary Information S1 (Eqs. S1 and S2).