TABLE IV.

Frequency compression conditions giving the highest speech intelligibility and quality for the high-loss subject group in comparison with the condition giving the highest predicted intelligibility or quality using an ensemble of ten neural networks.

	Intelligibility Subject best condition		Intelligibility predicted best condition		Quality Subject best condition		Quality Predicted best condition
Subject	Fcut, kHz	FCR	Fcut, kHz	FCR	Fcut, kHz	FCR	Fcut, kHz	FCR
1	3.0	1.0	1.5	1.5	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0
2	3.0	1.0	1.5	1.5	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0
3	2.0	1.5	1.5	1.5	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0
4	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0	1.5	1.5	3.0	1.0
5	1.5	2.0	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0
6	3.0	1.0	1.5	1.5	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0
7	3.0	1.0	1.5	1.5	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0
8	2.0	3.0	1.5	1.5	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0
9	3.0	1.0	1.5	1.5	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0
10	2.0	3.0	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0
11	2.0	1.5	2.0	1.5	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0
12	2.0	2.0	2.0	1.5	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0
13	3.0	1.0	2.0	1.5	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0
14	3.0	1.0	1.5	1.5	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0
15	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5	3.0	1.0
16	1.5	2.0	1.5	1.5	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0
17	1.5	2.0	2.0	3.0	2.0	1.5	3.0	1.0
18	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5	2.0	1.5	3.0	1.0
19	1.0	1.5	2.0	1.5	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0
20	2.0	1.5	2.0	1.5	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0
21	2.0	1.5	2.0	3.0	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0
22	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5	3.0	1.0
23	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0
24	2.0	3.0	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5	3.0	1.0
25	1.5	1.5	2.0	1.5	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0
26	1.0	1.5	1.5	1.5	3.0	1.0	3.0	1.0