Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 28.
Published in final edited form as: SIAM J Sci Comput. 2013 Jul 9;35(4):10.1137/120892386. doi: 10.1137/120892386

Table 4.1.

(A) Relative errors between the directly computed correlation and the correlation as computed by Recipes 1 and 2 for two real-valued functions A, B: ℝ3 → ℝ at varying expansion degrees over 500 randomly-generated rigid-body rotations. For L > 12, the direct correlation is exceedingly slow to compute therefore the relative error is omitted here. (B) The maximum complex value of the correlation score as a different error measure. Note that we used real valued input functions, and hence this table demonstrates the numerical error due to cut-offs. The above experiments were conducted with mixed bases; similar results hold for pure spherical bases, as the speedup scheme for these bases is the same as that used for Recipe 1.

(A)
L Recipe 1 Recipe 2
4 1.93e-5 1.26e-4
6 1.37e-5 1.44e-4
8 1.61e-5 1.22e-4
10 1.61e-5 1.34e-4
12 1.72e-5 1.32e-4
(B)
L Recipe 1 Recipe 2
4 1.71e-10 1.84e-10
6 1.53e-10 1.76e-10
8 1.72e-10 1.71e-10
10 1.77e-10 1.85e-10
12 1.41e-10 1.81e-10