Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 30;7:124. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00124

Table 3.

Clusters showing significantly different changes in connectivity after TBS to different sites.

Clusters Peak coordinate (MNI, LPI) Size (voxels, 2 mm3)
aI/fO vs. S1 TBS
aI/fO connectivity *R middle frontal gyrus +40.0 +46.0 +14.0 266
*L caudal middle frontal gyrus −50.0 +6.0 +36.0 244
*R lateral orbitofrontal cortex +32.0 +46.0 −8.0 236
*L middle frontal gyrus −38.0 +32.0 +14.0 210
*Bilateral caudate nucleus −12.0 −2.0 −10.0 208
*R caudal middle frontal gyrus +54.0 +18.0 +36.0 208
dlPFC connectivity Posterior cingulate cortex −2.0 −50.0 +34.0 415
R anterior middle temporal gyrus +66.0 −14.0 −8.0 246
Rostral anterior cingulate cortex −4.0 +52.0 −10.0 195
Anterior cingulate cortex −8.0 +26.0 −4.0 90
L angular gyrus −54.0 −66.0 +30.0 75
Anterior cingulate cortex +4.0 +30.0 −18.0 67
R anterior middle frontal gyrus, white matter (negative) +26.0 +42.0, +2.0 62
dlPFC vs. S1 TBS
aI/fO connectivity None
dlPFC connectivity *L anterior insula/inferior frontal gyrus −52.0 +22.0 −2.0 398
*R superior temporal sulcus +54.0 −10.0 −8.0 300
*R temporal pole +48.0 +24.0 −26.0 291

This table lists clusters that exhibited significantly different changes in connectivity between the different TBS conditions in the second block after TBS. The first section of the table lists significant clusters in the comparison between aI/fO TBS and S1 TBS, and the second section lists significant clusters in the comparison between dlPFC and S1 TBS. No significant differences were seen in the direct comparisons between aI/fO and dlPFC TBS. In each section, changes in connectivity with the aI/fO ROI are listed first, followed by changes in connectivity with the dlPFC ROI.

*

Alternative threshold: p(uncorrected) < 0.01, p(FWE corrected) < 0.05.