Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 30.
Published in final edited form as: Gerontologist. 2007 Oct;47(5):672–682. doi: 10.1093/geront/47.5.672

Table 3.

Quality Measures and Covariates

Measure % M (SD)
Resident-level quality measures
     Physical restraints (N = 5,209) 10
     Toileting program (N = 5,242) 39
     Active or passive range of motion training (N = 5,205) 12
     ADL training (N = 5,205) 9
     ADL decline (N = 4,076) 20
     Worsening bowel or bladder incontinence (N = 2,929) 31
     Worsening behavior problems (N = 4,533) 12
Resident-level covariates (N = 5,242)
     Ability to make self understood 0.98 (1.07)
     ADL score at time of study 15.62 (8.80)
     Age 83.05 (11.79)
     Anxiety disorder 15
     Behavior score at time of study 1.21 (2.15)
     Cognitive Performance Scale score 3.07 (1.82)
     Dementia 56
     Extensive/total eating assistance 28
     Female 76
     Day gap between STM study and STM assessment −0.2 (24.2)
     Day gap between STM assessment and follow-up assessment 90.4 (19.3)
     Hemiplegia/hemiparesis 8
     Length of stay <45 days 8
     Moderately/severely impaired decision making 81
     Motor agitation 22
     Personal Severity Index score 4.94 (1.77)
     RUG Clinically Complex category 16
     RUG Rehabilitation category 6
     RUG Special Care/Extensive category 12
     Self-locomotion on unit score 1.98 (1.66)
     Sum of range of motion limitations 1.98 (2.87)
Unit-level covariates (N = 157)
     State – Colorado 11
     State – Indiana 32
     State – Mississippi 17
     State – Minnesota 40
     Alzheimer’s special care unit 29
     Mean Cognitive Performance Scale score 3.08 (0.93)
     Mean ADL score 15.26 (3.74)
     % RUG Clinically Complex 16 (10.0)
     % RUG Special Care/Extensive 11 (12.1)
     % RUG Rehabilitation 9 (15.3)

Note: ADL = activity of daily living; STM = Staff Time Measurement Study; RUG = Resource Utilization Group III.