Table 3.
Advantages and disadvantages of ISAC, immunoCAP, and skin prick tests
Advantages | Disadvantages | |
---|---|---|
ISAC |
• 30 μl of serum or plasma (capillary or venous blood) |
• Manual method |
|
• 112 allergens can be assayed in parallel |
• Semi-quantitative assay |
|
• Natural and recombinants proteins |
• Less sensitive |
|
• Less allergen needed (approximately 100, 000-fold, pg vs. μg) per assay |
• More variability in the inter-assay analysis for certain allergens |
|
• No interference from very high total IgE |
• Greater coefficient of variation |
|
|
• Some allergen sources are not included |
|
|
• Less appropriate for monitoring sensitization |
|
|
• Potential interference between IgE and other isotypes, principally IgG |
ImmunoCAP |
• Automatic method |
• 40 μl of serum per allergen |
|
• Quantitative assay |
• One allergen per assay |
|
• High sensitivity |
• Detect low-affinity antibody that may have little to no clinical relevance |
|
• Lower coefficient of variation |
|
|
• Natural or recombinants proteins or crude extracts |
|
|
• Appropriate for monitoring sensitization |
|
Skin prick test |
• High sensitivity (extract-dependent) |
• Manual |
|
• Immediate reading |
• One allergen per prick |
|
|
• Only crude extracts |
• Not appropriate for monitoring sensitization |