Table 2.
Identity and similarity in FeoA, FeoB and FeoC from R. capsulatus SB1003, R. shaeroides 2.4.1 and R. ferroxidans SW2. Similarity is indicated using parenthesis.
FeoA | Rcap FeoA1 | Rcap FeoA2 | Rcap Feo2A | Rsph FeoA1 | Rsph FeoA2 | Rfer FeoA1 | Rfer FeoA2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rcap FeoA1 | 100 (100) | ||||||
Rcap FeoA2 | 19.57 (40.22) | 100 (100) | |||||
Rcap Feo2A | 15.05 (36.56) | 19.57 (36.96) | 100 (100) | ||||
Rsph FeoA1 | 30.00 (42.22) | 27.59 (36.78) | 18.89 (37.78) | 100 (100) | |||
Rsph FeoA2 | 18.48 (38.04) | 57.32 (69.51) | 19.10 (37.08) | 22.99 (35.63) | 100 (100) | ||
Rfer FeoA1 | 31.11 (48.89) | 22.09 (38.37) | 23.86 (40.91) | 52.44 (68.29) | 22.09 (38.37) | 100 (100) | |
Rfer FeoA2 | 20.65 (42.39) | 50.00 (68.29) | 15.73 (35.96) | 18.39 (34.48) | 65.82 (78.48) | 19.77 (37.21) | 100 (100) |
FeoB | Rcap FeoB | Rcap Feo2B | Rsph FeoB | Rfer FeoB |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rcap FeoB | 100 (100) | |||
Rcap Feo2B | 30.05 (45.64) | 100 (100) | ||
Rsph FeoB | 55.56 (71.84) | 29.13 (44.64) | 100 (100) | |
Rfer FeoB | 56.94 (72.73) | 29.99 (46.76) | 71.08 (82.62) | 100 (100) |
FeoC | Rcap FeoC | Rsph FeoC | Rfer FeoC |
---|---|---|---|
Rcap FeoC | 100 (100) | ||
Rsph FeoC | 30.95 (41.67) | 100 (100) | |
Rfer FeoC | 33.33 (44.05) | 35.71 (52.38) | 100 (100) |
Sequences were aligned using the CLC Sequence Viewer software (CLC Bio, Denmark). Similarity and identity scores were calculated based on alignments using the “Ident and Sim” utility (http://www.bioinformatics.org/sms2/ident_sim.html) (Stothard, 2000).