Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 30.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Bot Res. 2013 Mar 14;66:10.1016/B978-0-12-397923-0.00010-2. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-397923-0.00010-2

Table 2.

Identity and similarity in FeoA, FeoB and FeoC from R. capsulatus SB1003, R. shaeroides 2.4.1 and R. ferroxidans SW2. Similarity is indicated using parenthesis.

FeoA Rcap FeoA1 Rcap FeoA2 Rcap Feo2A Rsph FeoA1 Rsph FeoA2 Rfer FeoA1 Rfer FeoA2
Rcap FeoA1 100 (100)
Rcap FeoA2 19.57 (40.22) 100 (100)
Rcap Feo2A 15.05 (36.56) 19.57 (36.96) 100 (100)
Rsph FeoA1 30.00 (42.22) 27.59 (36.78) 18.89 (37.78) 100 (100)
Rsph FeoA2 18.48 (38.04) 57.32 (69.51) 19.10 (37.08) 22.99 (35.63) 100 (100)
Rfer FeoA1 31.11 (48.89) 22.09 (38.37) 23.86 (40.91) 52.44 (68.29) 22.09 (38.37) 100 (100)
Rfer FeoA2 20.65 (42.39) 50.00 (68.29) 15.73 (35.96) 18.39 (34.48) 65.82 (78.48) 19.77 (37.21) 100 (100)
FeoB Rcap FeoB Rcap Feo2B Rsph FeoB Rfer FeoB
Rcap FeoB 100 (100)
Rcap Feo2B 30.05 (45.64) 100 (100)
Rsph FeoB 55.56 (71.84) 29.13 (44.64) 100 (100)
Rfer FeoB 56.94 (72.73) 29.99 (46.76) 71.08 (82.62) 100 (100)
FeoC Rcap FeoC Rsph FeoC Rfer FeoC
Rcap FeoC 100 (100)
Rsph FeoC 30.95 (41.67) 100 (100)
Rfer FeoC 33.33 (44.05) 35.71 (52.38) 100 (100)

Sequences were aligned using the CLC Sequence Viewer software (CLC Bio, Denmark). Similarity and identity scores were calculated based on alignments using the “Ident and Sim” utility (http://www.bioinformatics.org/sms2/ident_sim.html) (Stothard, 2000).