Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 30;8(12):e82576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082576

Table 3. Concordance rate of each observer for scoring Mitotic Activity Index (MAI) using WSI and conventional microscopy.

Observer 1 Observer 2 Observer 3 Total
Mitotic scores estimation Digitally underestimated* 11 15 17 43
Digitally overestimated* 10 6 14 30
Same scores digitally and microscopically 79 79 69 227

Per observer, digital mitotic scores have been compared with the gold standard (the conventional mitotic scores) and assessed as under- or overestimated. This assessment is general and includes all scores categories, thus scores1, 2 and 3.