Table 1.
Scientific questions on diagnosis and prediction of neuroendocrine liver metastases.
| Questions | Sub-questions | |
| Should patients with low Ki67 index be followed up for the detection of liver metastases? | ||
|
|
In patients with a primary NET, what is the predictive value of Ki67 index, mitotic count, or tumor grading, obtained from the primary tumor, in predicting the development of liver metastases? | |
| Should genetic signatures and the presence of circulating tumor cells be used in the prediction of liver metastases and to inform treatment decisions? | ||
|
|
In patients with a primary NET, what is the predictive value of genetic signatures obtained from the primary tumor, in predicting the development of liver metastases? | |
| In patients with a primary NET, what is the predictive value of circulating tumor cells obtained from the primary tumor, in predicting the development of liver metastases? | ||
| In patients with a primary NET, should genetic signatures be used in the treatment decision (surgery, locally ablative techniques, liver-directed techniques, peptide receptor radionuclide treatment, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and biotherapy)? | ||
| In patients with a primary NET, should the presence of circulating tumor cells be used in the treatment decision (surgery, locally ablative techniques, liver-directed techniques, peptide receptor radionuclide treatment, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and biotherapy)? | ||
| Which biochemical markers should be used for detection and post treatment follow-up of liver metastases? | ||
|
|
In patients with a primary NET, what is the diagnostic accuracy of the available biochemical markers (eg, chromogranin A and B, Serotonin, neuron-specific-enolase (NSE), tumor specific hormones) in detecting liver metastases? | |
| In patients receiving a liver resection, what is the diagnostic accuracy of the available biochemical markers (eg, chromogranin A and B, serotonin, NSE, tumor specific hormones) obtained during follow-up, in detecting recurrent disease or disease progression? | ||
| Which morphological imaging modality should be used to assess resectability of liver metastases with a curative intent? | ||
|
|
In patients with NET liver metastases, what is the diagnostic accuracy of different morphological imaging modalities (US, CT, MRI) in identifying liver lesions and extrahepatic disease? | |
| In patients with NET liver metastases, what is the diagnostic accuracy of different morphological imaging modalities (US, CT, 3D-CT, MRI) in detecting vascular and biliary invasion, in order to assess resectability (R0/R1)? | ||
| Which functional imaging modality should be used to assess resectability of liver metastases with a curative intent? | ||
|
|
In patients with NET liver metastases, what is the diagnostic accuracy of different functional imaging modalities (octreoscan, DOTA-SSTR-PET/CT, F-18 FDG-PET/CT, DOPA PET, etc) in identifying liver lesions? | |
| In patients with NET liver metastases, what is the diagnostic accuracy of different functional imaging modalities (octreoscan, DOTA-SSTR-PET/CT, F-18 FDG-PET/CT, DOPA PET, other) in detecting extra-hepatic disease? | ||
| Do we need a biopsy of both the primary and liver metastases for the treatment decision of liver metastases? | ||
|
|
In patients with a primary NET and synchronous liver metastases, what is the agreement between the biopsy of the primary and the liver metastases with regards to tumor grading? | |
| In patients with metachronous liver metastases, what is the agreement between the biopsy of the primary and the liver metastases with regards to tumor grading? | ||
| In patients with liver metastases, what is the agreement between single vs multiple liver biopsies with regards to tumor grading? | ||
| In patients with NET liver metastases, do we need additional biopsies from normal parenchyma to detect micrometastases? | ||