Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 23;2(2):e60. doi: 10.2196/resprot.2890

Table 6.

Eligibility criteria for review on functional imaging modality.

Study characteristic Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria
Patient population Patients with NET Children or adolescents (under the age of 18 years)
Patients with liver metastases
Test of interest SPECTa
SPECT/CTb
SRSc
123I-MIBG-Scintigraphyd
18F-FDA-PETe
18F-FDG-PETf
18F-DOPA PET/CTg
PET/CTh
PET/MRIi
111In-SRSj
123I-SRSk
Study design Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) Case reports
Prospective and retrospective comparative cohort studies
Noncomparative cohort studies
Case-control studies
Case series Reviews
Reporting
Studies that do not report the diagnostic accuracy
Studies that do not report the assessment of resectability

aSingle photon emission computed tomography

bHybrid method of single photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography

cSomatostatin receptor scintigraphy

d(123) Iodine-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy

e(18) Fluoro-dopamine positron emission tomography

f(18) Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography

g (18) Fluoro-L-dihydroxyphenylalanine positron emission tomography

hHybrid method of positron emission tomography and computed tomography

i Hybrid method of positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

j(111) Indium-somatostatin receptor scintigraphy

k(123) Iodine-somatostatin receptor scintigraphy