Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 6;5(12):4990–5011. doi: 10.3390/nu5124990

Table 1.

Prospective observational studies of magnesium intake and risk of type 2 diabetes.

Author (Year) Study/Population Total No. (No. Cases) Follow-up (Years) Association 1
Dong et al. (2011) [3] Meta-analysis of 13 studies through 2011 536,318 (24,516) 4–20 RR = 0.78 (0.73–0.84)
Schulze et al. (2007) [49] Meta-analysis of 8 studies through 2006 271,869 (9192) 4–16 RR = 0.77 (0.72–0.84)
Larsson and Wolk (2007) [44] Meta-analysis of 7 studies 1966–2007 286,668 (10,915) 4–17 RR per 100 mg/day = 0.85 (0.79–0.92)
Hruby et al. (2013) [50] ~54 years old; Framingham Heart Study (US) 2582 (179) 7 RR = 0.49 (0.27–0.88), p trend = 0.01
Hopping et al. (2010) [51] 45–75 years old; Multi-Ethnic Cohort Study (US) 75,512 (8587) 14 Men HR = 0.77 (0.70–0.85), p trend < 0.0001; Women HR = 0.84 (0.76–0.93), p trend = 0.0003
Kim et al. (2010) [42] 18–30 years old; Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (US) 4497 (330) 20 HR = 0.53 (0.32–0.86), p trend < 0.01
Kirii et al. (2010) [52] 40–65 years old; Japan Collaborative Cohort Study for Evaluation of Cancer Risk (Japan) 17,592 (459) 5 OR = 0.64 (0.44 to 0.94), p trend =  0.04
Nanri et al. (2010) [53] 45–75 years old; Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study (Japan) 59,791 (1114) 5 Men OR = 0.86 (0.63–1.16), p ≥ 0.05; Women OR = 0.92 (0.66–1.28), p ≥ 0.05
Villegas et al. (2009) [47] ~50 years old; Shanghai Women’s Health Study (China) 64,191 (2270) 7 HR = 0.80 (0.68, 0.93), p trend < 0.0001
Schulze et al. (2007) [49] 35–65 years old; EPIC–Potsdam (Germany) 25,067 (844) 11 RR = 0.90 (0.72–1.12), p trend = 0.44
He et al. (2006) [54] 2 18–30 years old; Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (US) 4637 (226) 15 HR = 0.51 (0.32–0.83), p trend < 0.01
van Dam et al. (2006) [48] ~38 years old; Black Women’s Health Study (US) 41,186 (1964) 8 HR = 0.65 (0.54–0.78), p trend < 0.0001
Lopez-Ridaura et al. (2004) [45] ~46 years old; Nurses’ Health Study (US) 85,060 (4085) 18 RR = 0.66 (0.60–0.73), p trend < 0.001
Lopez-Ridaura et al. (2004) [45] ~54 years old; Health Professionals’ Follow-up Study (US) 42,872 (1333) 12 RR = 0.67 (0.56–0.80), p trend < 0.001
Hodge et al. (2004) [55] ~54 years old; Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study (Australia) 31,641 (365) 4 OR per 500 mg/day = 0.62 (0.43–0.90)
Song et al. (2004) [41] ~54 years old; Women’s Health Study (US) 39,345 (918) 6 RR = 0.89 (0.71–1.10), p trend = 0.05
Meyer et al. (2000) [56] ~61.5 years old; Iowa Women’s Health Study (US) 35,988 (1141) 6 RR = 0.67 (0.55–0.82), p trend = 0.0003
Kao et al. (1999) [57] ~53 years old; Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (US) 12,128 (1106) 6 Black OR = 1.02 (0.58–1.76) 3, p trend = 0.68; White OR = 0.93 (0.67–1.29) 3, p trend = 0.84

1 Reporting the multivariate-adjusted association (95% confidence interval) for high versus low intake, unless otherwise specified; 2 Primary study outcome was metabolic syndrome, of which impaired fasting glucose and/or type 2 diabetes was included as a component; 3 Highest intake category is reference category; presenting association reported for lowest intake category. HR, hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio; RR, relative risk.