Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 18;5(12):5218–5232. doi: 10.3390/nu5125218

Table 2.

Nutritional composition of the subjects’ diets throughout the study period 1.

Nutrients Placebo (n = 42) MP (n = 38) P-Value 2
Week 0 Week 8 Week 0 Week 8
Diet quality score 3 23 ± 1.2 20 ± 1.1 19 ± 1.1 18 ± 1.0 0.448
Total energy (kcal) 4 1778 ± 69 1702 ± 56 1789 ± 68 1772 ± 65 0.587
Carbohydrate (g) 4 250 ± 10 237 ± 8 257 ± 10 252 ± 10 0.940
Fat (g) 4 49 ± 3.1 49 ± 2.9 50 ± 3.2 50 ± 3.0 0.557
Protein (g) 4 72 ± 3.0 71 ± 3.0 72 ± 4 74 ± 4 0.883
Fiber (g) 18 ± 0.8 17 ± 0.9 17 ± 1.0 16 ± 0.9 0.511
β-Carotene (mg) 4 3.2 ± 0.2 2.6 ± 0.2 1.9 ± 0.2 4.8 ± 0.2 <0.0001
Vitamin C (mg) 4 72 ± 5.1 64 ± 4.1 63 ± 5.5 243 ± 4.4 <0.0001
Vitamin E (mg) 4 14 ± 1.0 14 ± 0.8 13 ± 0.9 58 ± 1.1 <0.0001
Folate (μg) 4 227 ± 13 211 ± 11 213 ± 18 570 ± 13 <0.0001
Zinc (mg) 4 8.2 ± 0.4 8.3 ± 0.4 8.2 ± 0.5 20 ± 0.5 <0.0001
Iron (mg) 4 14 ± 0.7 15 ± 2.7 13 ± 0.8 22 ± 0.9 <0.0001

1 All values are the means ± SE. Intake levels were estimated from three-day food records using CAN-pro (Korean Nutrition Society, Seoul, Korea). The intake of the test product was included in the analysis. MP, multi-micronutrient supplement with nutritional doses of antioxidant nutrients and plant ingredients; 2 Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to test the difference for group (Placebo and MP) × week (Week 0 and Week 8); 3 Diet quality score was measured using a validated scoring method [16]; 4 Data were square-root transformed for normalization.