TABLE 2.
Real distance matrix analysis with the 33 different ITS1 and ITS2 sequences obtaineda
| Haplotype | Haplotype no. | Real distance
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | ||
| Eg | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | |
| Je | 2 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | |
| Ne | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Ig | 4 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 3 | |
| Eo | 5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | |
| IIg | 6 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | |
| Ge | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | |
| No | 8 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | |
| IIIg | 9 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | |
| IV1 | 10 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | |
| Ng | 11 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | |
| E2 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | |
| V3 | 13 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 | |
| E4 | 14 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | |
| Gh | 15 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | |
| VIg | 16 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | |
| E5 | 17 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | |
| VII6 | 18 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| E7 | 19 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | |
| G6 | 20 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | |
| E9 | 21 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | |
| VIII10 | 22 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | |
| IXg | 23 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | |
| Xg | 24 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | |
| XI11 | 25 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| E12 | 26 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
a
The distances were determined with the TCS program (version 1.13; Clement et al., Brigham Young University). ITS1 and ITS2 sequences were concatenated. Gaps were treated as missing data. The parsimony limit was 95%.