Table 5.

Results Obtained Simulating Strategies MPC1 and MPC2 on the Nominal Scenario^a

		Nominal scenario
		O	N	PP
M (mg/dl)	MPC1	140.74	124.42	156.30
	MPC2	139.57	115.96 b	157.78
	p value	0.16	8.51·10−8	0.70
SD (mg/dl)	MPC1	28.63	13.07	26.02
	MPC2	27.41	9.35b	24.55
	p value	0.20	1.28·10−5	0.10
Tt (%)	MPC1	86.33	99.02	76.22
	MPC2	87.64	99.81	77.22
	p value	0.08	0.05	0.34
Ttt (%)	MPC1	52.69	82.07	32.02
	MPC2	59.01c	94.69b	32.54
	p value	3.33·10−3	2.53·10−6	0.82
Ta ( %)	MPC1	12.45	0.78	23.18
	MPC2	12.31	0.19	22.78
	p value	0.37	0.24	0.54
Tb (%)	MPC1	1.23	0.20	0.60
	MPC2	0.05b	0.00	0.00c
	p value	4.70·10−4	0.08	1.23·10−3
Th (%)	MPC1	0.49	0.01	0.26
	MPC2	0.00c	0.00	0.00d
	p value	7.31·10−3	0.32	0.04

^aO is overall, N is night, PP is the mean relative to all postprandial periods; M is the mean of the BG (mg/dl); SD is the standard deviation of the BG (mg/dl); Tt is the percentage of time spent in euglycemic target (70–180 mg/dl); Ttt is the percentage of time spent in tight target (80–140 mg/dl); Ta is the percentage of time spent above 180 mg/dl; Tb is the percentage of time spent below 70 mg/dl; and Th is the percentage of time spent below 50 (mg/dl).

^bp < .0 01.

^cp < .01.

^dp < .05.