Table 2.

Results from Monofractal Detrended Fluctuation Analysis of Sensor Glucose and ISIG Data Over Cohort

Analyzing calibrated SG data
CGM device type (both in abdomen)
	Guardian	iPro2	P value
Number of data sets	9	8
Scaling exponent (H)	1.43 (1.37–1.48)	1.56 (1.46–1.60)
Difference in H (iPro2 - Guardian)	0.10 (0.03–0.20)		0.08a
Sensor location (both iPro2)
	Abdomen	Thigh	P value
Number of data sets	8	9
Scaling exponent (H)	1.56 (1.46–1.60)	1.52 (1.50–1.61)
Difference in H (thigh - abdomen)	0.04 (-0.06–0.11)		0.64a
Analyzing pre-calibration ISIG data
CGM device type (both in abdomen)
	Guardian	iPro2	P value
Number of data sets	9	8
Scaling exponent (H)	1.42 (1.34–1.52)	1.54 (1.37–1.60)
Difference in H (iPro2 - Guardian)	0.06 (-0.04–0.10)		0.53a
Sensor location (both iPro2)
	Abdomen	Thigh	P value
Number of data sets	8	9
Scaling exponent (H)	1.54 (1.37–1.60)	1.51 (1.47–1.60)
Difference in H (thigh - abdomen)	0.04 (-0.03–0.09)		0.38a

^aWilcoxon signed rank test.