Polonsky16
|
|
Cluster randomized to structured testing using a paper tool and seven-point testing + education or active control receiving routine care (ACG) |
Significant reduction in HbA1c in both groups, but effect was larger in the STG (-1.2 ± 0.09% versus -0.9 ± 0.10% in insulin tolerance test analysis; -1.3 ± 0.11% versus -0.8 ± 0.11% in per protocol analysis)
STG: significant reductions in seven-point SMBG profile, more treatment change recommendations, greater general wellbeing
|
Polonsky26
|
|
Cluster randomized to structured testing (STG) using a paper tool and seven-point testing + education or active control receiving routine care (ACG) |
Greater treatment modifications in the STG
Greater reduction in HbA1c in the STG versus ACG (-1.2% versus -0.9%)
Two times more patients started on insulin in the STG
|
Polonsky27
|
36 primary care professionals and 25 internists |
|
78% of primary care professionals correctly identified glucose patterns
53% of primary care professionals found SMBG data of equal value than that of HbA1c, and 33% found them of greater value
Three-day, seven-point glucose profile and standard log book most favorable formats (78.7%)
|
Lalic28
|
|
Structured glucose monitoring and lifestyle adjustments: seven-point SMBG profile on three consecutive days prior to baseline and months 1, 2, and 3; routine BG test (>1 test per day); use of Accu-Chek 360o |
Significant reduction in mean HbA1c (-1.2 ± 1.6%; p < .001)
Significant reduction in mean BG (-36.4 ± 52.5 mg/dl; p < .001)
Significant changes in seven-point BG values, lipid parameters, and blood pressure
Significant diference between T1DM and T2DM individuals in changes in weight, body mass index, and blood pressure but not in HbA1c reduction
Accu-Chek 360o acceptance was high among participants (>80%) and HCPs (87.5%)
|
Rodbard29
|
288 clinicians: 40% family physicians, 38% internists, and 22% nurse practitioners |
Review of 30 cases with either: structured SMBG data, structured SMBG with decision support tool, structured SMBG with DVD, or structured SMBG with decision support tool + DVD |
|
Cox30
|
|
Retrospective evaluation of SMBG data to look for prediction of severe hypoglycemia events |
Severe hypoglycemia associated with increase in low BG index in 24 h prior to severe hypoglycemia in both participants with T1DM and T2DM
Algorithm predicted 58-60% of imminent episodes of severe hypoglycemia; this increased if five readings per day were present
|
Kempf31
|
|
SMBG + lifestyle intervention: seven-point SMBG profile at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, and 12; healthy diet and physical activity; make changes to lifestyle based on SMBG results |
Significant reduction in weight (-2.3 kg; p < .001) and HbA1c (-0.3%; p < .001)
Significant improvement in cardiovascular disease risk factors
Significant increase in quality of diet, physical activity, general wellbeing, and physical and mental health
Correlation between weight reduction and change in HbA1c: each kilogram of weight loss associated with a mean HbA1c reduction of 0.05%
|
Hansen32
|
1076 individuals with T1DM |
Retrospective evaluation of SMBG data
Adherence, and characteristics associated with adherence, to SMBG
Questionnaire included SMBG frequency, motives for performing SMBG, hypoglycemia experience and awareness, demography, lifestyle
|
Suboptimal adherence to SMBG: 3% did not perform SMBG at all, 33% did not perform routine tests, 61% did not do the test on a daily basis
Association between higher test frequency and age, insulin regimen, lower HbA1c, and hypoglycemia awareness
|