Table 2.
Patient characteristics | Temperature (°C ), mean (SD) | |||||||||||||
# | M/F | Age | DM type | Neuropathy | PAD | Complicationsb | Foot | Ipsilateral footc | Contralateral foot | ΔT1 | ROI ipsilateral footd | ROI contralateral footd | ΔT2 | ΔT3 |
No complications | ||||||||||||||
1 | M | 58 | 2 | Yes | No | – | 33.6 (1.4) | 33.6 (1.4) | 0.0 | |||||
2 | F | 36 | 1 | No | No | – | 29.6 (2.7) | 29.4 (2.6) | 0.2 | |||||
3 | M | 84 | 2 | Yes | Yes | – | 29.4 (1.8) | 29.7 (1.1) | −0.3 | |||||
4 | M | 79 | 2 | Yes | No | – | 28.8 (1.7) | 29.6 (1.6) | −0.8 | |||||
5 | M | 81 | 2 | Yes | No | – | 33.9 (1.9) | 33.8 (1.0) | 0.1 | |||||
Local complications | ||||||||||||||
6 | M | 76 | 2 | Yes | No | Ulcer hallux (1A) | Left | 30.8 (2.4) | 29.3 (2.0) | 1.5 | 35.0 (0.6) | 26.2 (0.7) | 8.8 | 4.2 |
7 | M | 69 | 2 | Yes | Yes | Ulcer hallux (1A) | Right | 26.1 (1.4) | 26.2 (1.4) | −0.1 | 28.9 (0.6) | 24.9 (0.7) | 4.0 | 2.8 |
8 | M | 49 | 2 | Yes | No | Ulcer hallux (1A) | Right | 29.5 (2.0) | 29.1 (1.4) | 0.4 | 32.7 (0.9) | 31.5 (0.5) | 1.2 | 3.2 |
9 | M | 68 | 2 | Yes | No | Ulcer 2nd ray (1A)e | Left | 30.8 (1.5) | 30.2 (1.1) | 0.6 | 33.1 (0.3) | 30.6 (0.3) | 2.5 | 2.3 |
10 | F | 67 | 2 | Yes | No | Callus MTP2–4 | Left | 26.0 (1.1) | 24.9 (0.7) | 1.1 | 27.3 (0.1) | 25.0 (0.2) | 2.3 | 1.3 |
Diffuse complications | ||||||||||||||
11 | M | 81 | 2 | Yes | Yes | Critical ischemia Ulcer hallux (1C) | Right | 25.1 (0.7) | 29.0 (2.0) | −3.9 | 24.0 (0.1) | 24.6 (0.1) | −0.6 | −1.1 |
12 | M | 71 | 2 | Yes | No | Charcot foot Ulcer hallux (1A) | Left Left | 33.6 (1.1) | 28.1 (1.4) | 5.5 | 34.1 (0.3) | 26.4 (0.3) | 7.7 | 0.5 |
13 | F | 84 | 2 | Yes | No | Ulcer MTP1 with osteomyelitis (3B) | Left | 30.0 (1.5) | 27.0 (1.4) | 3.0 | 31.1 (0.5) | 26.2 (0.1) | 4.9 | 1.1 |
14 | M | 79 | 2 | Yes | No | Charcot foot Ulcer lateral midfoot with osteomyelitis (3B) | Left Left | 32.1 (1.9) | 26.0 (1.2) | 6.1 | 33.4 (0.3) | 25.9 (0.3) | 7.5 | 1.3 |
15 | M | 60 | 2 | Yes | No | Ulcer MTP5 with osteomyelitis (3B) | Right | 32.3 (1.0) | 28.6 (1.0) | 3.7 | 33.0 (0.5) | 29.3 (0.3) | 3.7 | 0.7 |
#, patient number; M, male; F, female; DM, diabetes mellitus; MTP, metatarsophalangeal joint; PAD, peripheral arterial disease; ΔT1, difference between mean temperature of ipsilateral and contralateral foot; ΔT2, difference between mean temperature of ROI and corresponding contralateral ROI; ΔT3, difference between mean temperature of ROI and mean temperature of ipsilateral foot.
Between brackets: Ulcer classification according to University of Texas wound classification.
For patients without complications, left foot was defined as ipsilateral foot.
The ROIs in patients with diffuse complications were their ulcer locations.
Only one complication of patient 9 is shown. In Figure 3 it can be seen that another ROI (abundant callus on first metatarsophalangeal joint) is present on the right foot. However, as there was no contralateral metatarsophalangeal joint 1 due to amputation, this ROI is not further analyzed.