Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 1;7(5):1294–1304. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700520

Table 5.

Mean Absolute Relative Difference Results for All Samples (Secondary Analyses)

Blood glucose meter Glucose concentration ≥70 mg/dl (n = 190)a Glucose concentration >70 mg/dl (n = 198) Overall glucose concentration (23.5–386 mg/dl)
Fresh (natural) samples (n = 146) Glycolyzed samples (n = 242)
MARD, % 95% Confidence interval Standard error, % P valueb MARD, % 95% Confidence interval Standard error, % P valueb MARD, % 95% Confidence interval Standard error, % P valueb MARD, % 95% Confidence interval Standard error, % P valueb
EZ 0.65 -5.5 to 6.8 3.1 Not applicable 5.5 0.7 to 10.3 2.4 Not applicable 8.9 4.5 to 13.3 2.2 Not applicable 11.2 4.8 to 17.5 3.3 Not applicable
ACAP 2.5 -3.6 to 8.7 3.1 3.1 × 10-9 6.9 2.1 to 11.6 2.4 9.6 × 10-5 10.3 5.9 to 14.7 2.2 4.8 × 10–4 12.9 6.5 to 19.3 3.3 2.0 × 10-9
FFL 18.3 12.1 to 24.4 3.1 8.0 × 10-11 15.3 10.5 to 20.0 2.4 7.4 × 10-11 18.5 14.1 to 22.9 2.2 9.7 × 10-11 27.2 20.8 to 33.5 3.3 4.2 × 10-11
OTU2 22.4 16.2 to 28.6 3.1 8.0 × 10-11 21.3 16.5 to 26.1 2.4 7.4 × 10-11 24.5 20.2 to 28.9 2.2 9.7 × 10-11 31.6 25.3 to 38.0 3.3 4.2 × 10-11
TT 33.2 27.1 to 39.4 3.1 8.0 × 10-11 16.3 11.5 to 21.1 2.4 7.4 × 10-11 17.7 13.3 to 22.1 2.2 9.7 × 10-11 40.3 33.9 to 46.7 3.3 4.2 × 10-11
a

Of the 190 blood samples with glucose concentrations <70 mg/dl, 6 samples were fresh (natural) and 184 samples were glycolyzed.

b

Versus the EZ BGMS as determined using Tukey’s honestly significant difference methodology.