Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 12;2013:638312. doi: 10.1155/2013/638312

Table 1.

M20 and M30 ECD characteristics in patients and controls.

Left hemisphere Right hemisphere
t (ms) x (mm) y (mm) z (mm) s (nA m) t (ms) x (mm) y (mm) z (mm) s (nA m)
M20
 Patients 21.3 ± 2.0 −48,9 ± 8,7 −20,9 ± 10.7 64,3 ± 15,6 17.9 ± 7.8 21.3 ± 1.9 48,5 ± 9,0 −14,5 ± 10,2 70,3 ± 13,9 15.7 ± 6.5
 Controls 22.3 ± 1.7 −44,2 ± 7,0 −13,4 ± 9,3 67,7 ± 9,3 21.8 ± 11.6 22,3 ± 2.3 44,9 ± 7,5 −11,4 ± 9,8 71,7 ± 9,0 19.2 ± 8.0
M30
 Patients 28.9 ± 3.4 −37,6 ± 25,4 −21,5 ± 8,8 65,7 ± 15,3 29.2 ± 17.8 29.6 ± 4.6 41,9 ± 8,0 −19,7 ± 11,9 69,5 ± 15,1 26.3 ± 14.4
 Controls 30.5 ± 3.4 −39,8 ± 9,0 −13,5 ± 7,3 69,1 ± 9,0 29.1 ± 18.4 30.3 ± 4.0 38,6 ± 9,4 −14,6 ± 7,9 74.8 ± 8,3 26.4 ± 16.4

Mean and standard deviation of latencies (t), positions (x, y, z) and strength (s) of equivalent current dipoles explaining M20 and M30 magnetic field distributions (see methods).