Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 26;13:50. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-13-50

Table 3.

Impact of the pneumatic device on tracheal cuff pressure and microaspiration of gastric content

Variables Continuous control of P cuff n = 64 Routine care n = 64 p OR (95% CI)
Recording duration, h
24 (23–24)
24 (23–24)
0.198
 
Mean airway pressure, cm H2O
13 (11–18)
13 (11–17)
0.216
 
Mean Pcuff, cm H2O
26 (24–28)
22 (20–28)
0.017
 
Coefficient of Pcuff variation, %
5 (3–12)
19 (15–30)
<0.001
 
Pcuff 20-30 cm H2O
 
 
 
 
  yes
64 (100)
64 (100)
NA
 
  % of recording time
95 (70–99)
44 (30–59)
<0.001
 
Pcuff <20 or >30, cm H2O
 
 
 
 
  Yes
41 (66)
64 (100)
<0.001
 
  Duration >30 min
33 (51)
64 (100)
<0.001
 
Pcuff <20, cm H2O
 
 
 
 
  Yes
19 (29)
60 (93)
<0.001
1.46 (1.23-1.73)
  Duration > 30 min
16 (25)
57 (89)
<0.001
2.63 (1.11-6.21)
  % of recording time
0.01 (0–2)
32 (9–54)
<0.001
 
Pcuff >30, cm H2O
 
 
 
 
  Yes
33 (51)
62 (96)
0.001
1.57 (1.10-2.24)
  Duration >30 min
25 (39)
54 (84)
<0.001
1.50 (1.11-2.20
  % of recording time
0.9 (0–17)
14 (4–30)
<0.001
 
Microaspiration of gastric content
32 (50)
38 (59)
0.238
 
Pepsin, ng/mL
185 (113–296)
203 (120–338)
0.171
 
% of tracheal aspirates positive for pepsin 29 (0–74) 45 (0–100) 0.162  

Data are frequencies (%) or median (Interquartile range). Pcuff, cuff pressure.

Yes indicates that a patient had the variable at least once.