Table 6.
Responsiveness of EQ VAS score and EQ-5D index scores anchored by LSAS total score change
| |
Improvement of health status
|
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|Mean difference| (SD
mean difference
) |
Effect size |
|||||||||
| Time interval | n | EQ VAS score | EQ-5D index-G | EQ-5D index-UK | EQ VAS score | EQ-5D index-G | EQ-5D index-UK | |||
| t0-t1 ( 6 m) |
235 |
|
|
.073 (.183) |
|
|
|
|
0.44 |
* |
| t0-t2 (12 m) |
214 |
3.79 (16.7) |
.026 (.132) |
.083 (.173) |
0.24 |
* |
0.23 |
* |
0.50 |
* |
| t0-t3 (18 m) |
189 |
4.51 (16.8) |
.038 (.123) |
.107 (.175) |
0.26 |
* |
0.30 |
* |
0.64 |
* |
| t0-t4 (30 m) | 129 | .091 (.198) | 0.53 | * | ||||||
LSAS: Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale; m: months. * p ≤ 0.005. A change of the LSAS total score was defined by more than 0 ± 0.5 SD (baseline). For clarity, we displayed only significant results.