Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 21;14:908. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-908

Table 4.

Selection signatures detected by XP-EHH for all ten breeds

Control Breed
 Case Breed
  GLW BBB RH BBV OBV MWF FGV DFV ABB IMB
GLW
 -
 51
 62
 77
 60
 69
 45
 53
 26
 11
BBB
 71
 -
 50
 37
 46
 45
 42
 50
 18
 22
RH
 63
 76
 -
 82
 44
 90
 58
 70
 16
 33
BBV
 139
 117
 130
 -
 62
 217
 118
 115
 23
 14
OBV
 86
 78
 64
 118
 -
 76
 63
 82
 25
 19
MWF
 32
 60
 42
 39
 32
 -
 47
 64
 18
 18
FGV
 65
 66
 52
 95
 49
 75
 -
 73
 20
 19
DFV
 65
 80
 72
 100
 45
 79
 67
 -
 19
 18
Total a)
 199
 232
 217
 201
 175
 414
 290
 269
 123
 129
Final
 128
 144
 131
 140
 100
 229
 153
 151
 43
 32
SNP/Signature
 11.64
 7.38
 10.00
 14.11
 8.79
 5.48
 5.37
 7.19
 3.02
 2.59
N e5
110.74
 68.36
 111.48
 84.45
 92.31
 52.64
 109.95
 126.53
 183.70
 149.76
N e50
282.55
 322.29
 388.91
 254.77
 425.88
 283.17
 463.48
 548.95
 1680.69
 1054.34
N e5 /N e50 0.39 0.21 0.29 0.33 0.22 0.19 0.24 0.23 0.11 0.14

For each analysed breed (Case Breed) there is a column showing the number of significant selection signatures detected in comparison to the respective “Control Breed”, the number of significant selection signatures including singletons (Total), the number of signatures confirmed by neighbouring markers and/or multiple significant breed-comparisons (Final), the average number of SNPs per final signature (SNPs/Signature), the effective population sizes of 5 (Ne 5 ), and 50 (Ne 50 ) generations ago as well as their ratio (Ne 5 /Ne 50 ).

a)As the same signature can be detected by comparison of one breed to several others, this is not simply the sum of all significant signatures.